Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 1 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 70 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 82 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 95 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 76 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 75 |
| Dry | 90 | 29 |
| Wet | 64 | 82 |
| Snow | 90 | 88 |
| Comfort | 64 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 89 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 90 |
| Handling | 78 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its exceptional grip and longevity in severe winter conditions, while others report significant concerns regarding noise levels and wet-weather performance. The disparity in user experience appears to be heavily influenced by the age of the rubber compound at the time of purchase and specific driving environments.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and climbing ability in deep snow and challenging winter conditions.
- Impressive long-term durability and sidewall integrity over extended periods.
- Stable and sporty handling characteristics on dry pavement.
Cons
- Reports of excessive road noise during operation.
- Inconsistent performance on wet or cold surfaces, with some users noting a lack of grip.
- Sensitivity to rubber aging, which can significantly degrade performance if tires are not fresh.
Observations
- Users operating the tire on AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester report high satisfaction with stability and control across mixed winter conditions.
- The tire's performance profile is highly dependent on the age of the compound, suggesting that storage time prior to purchase is a critical factor for this specific model.
The Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented winter tire that excels in severe ice and snow conditions. Users consistently praise its robust stud retention and predictable handling, positioning it as a competitive alternative to premium European brands.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and braking performance on ice and packed snow
- High-quality stud retention and long-term durability
- Predictable side grip and cornering stability
- Excellent value-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Vague steering feedback on dry tarmac
- Noticeable understeer when driving on dry road surfaces
- Performance on dry pavement does not match the precision of premium summer-oriented winter tires
Observations
- Long-term users report that the rubber compound remains malleable and effective even after multiple seasons of harsh Nordic winters.
- The tire maintains consistent performance characteristics across various vehicle types, including those with higher horsepower outputs.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Hankook
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 — better dry. Pick the Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 if wet and treadwear matter most to you.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 scores 90 vs 29 on dry.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 82 vs 64 on wet.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 90 vs 80 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.