Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

Winter Ultra High Performance tires

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
64
Snow
90
Comfort
64
Noise
–
Treadwear
80
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Hankook

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

Premium Touring Winter tire

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
58/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
83/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
29
Wet
82
Snow
88
Comfort
64
Noise
89
Treadwear
90
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 — better dry. Pick the Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 if wet and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak LM25 4X4 leads by 61
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
90
B — Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
29
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Winter i*pike RS2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 1
Tyre Reviews owners 90 70

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Winter i*pike RS2 leads by 18
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
64
B — Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
82
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Winter i*pike RS2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 64 82

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Blizzak LM25 4X4 leads by 2
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
90
B — Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
88
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Winter i*pike RS2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 90 95

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
64
B — Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
64
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Winter i*pike RS2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 56
Tyre Reviews owners 64 76

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
–
B — Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
89
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Winter i*pike RS2
Professional tests (TWG score) – 89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Winter i*pike RS2 leads by 10
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
80
B — Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
90
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Winter i*pike RS2
Tyre Reviews owners 80 90

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Winter i*pike RS2 leads by 2
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
78
B — Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
80
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Winter i*pike RS2
Tyre Reviews owners 78 80

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Relative Score 77 75
Dry 90 29
Wet 64 82
Snow 90 88
Comfort 64 64
Noise – 89
Treadwear 80 90
Handling 78 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its exceptional grip and longevity in severe winter conditions, while others report significant concerns regarding noise levels and wet-weather performance. The disparity in user experience appears to be heavily influenced by the age of the rubber compound at the time of purchase and specific driving environments.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and climbing ability in deep snow and challenging winter conditions.
  • Impressive long-term durability and sidewall integrity over extended periods.
  • Stable and sporty handling characteristics on dry pavement.

Cons

  • Reports of excessive road noise during operation.
  • Inconsistent performance on wet or cold surfaces, with some users noting a lack of grip.
  • Sensitivity to rubber aging, which can significantly degrade performance if tires are not fresh.

Observations

  • Users operating the tire on AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester report high satisfaction with stability and control across mixed winter conditions.
  • The tire's performance profile is highly dependent on the age of the compound, suggesting that storage time prior to purchase is a critical factor for this specific model.
Tire B Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

The Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 is widely regarded as a high-value, performance-oriented winter tire that excels in severe ice and snow conditions. Users consistently praise its robust stud retention and predictable handling, positioning it as a competitive alternative to premium European brands.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and braking performance on ice and packed snow
  • High-quality stud retention and long-term durability
  • Predictable side grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent value-to-performance ratio

Cons

  • Vague steering feedback on dry tarmac
  • Noticeable understeer when driving on dry road surfaces
  • Performance on dry pavement does not match the precision of premium summer-oriented winter tires

Observations

  • Long-term users report that the rubber compound remains malleable and effective even after multiple seasons of harsh Nordic winters.
  • The tire maintains consistent performance characteristics across various vehicle types, including those with higher horsepower outputs.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
CategoryWinter Ultra High Performance tiresPremium Touring Winter tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Hankook

Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 — better dry. Pick the Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 if wet and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 scores 90 vs 29 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 82 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 90 vs 80 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.