Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 97 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 98 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 91 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 97 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 95 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 93 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 92 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 36 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 94 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 92 |
| Dry | 90 | 97 |
| Wet | 64 | 93 |
| Snow | 90 | 94 |
| Comfort | 64 | 91 |
| Noise | – | 36 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 94 |
| Handling | 78 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its exceptional grip and longevity in severe winter conditions, while others report significant concerns regarding noise levels and wet-weather performance. The disparity in user experience appears to be heavily influenced by the age of the rubber compound at the time of purchase and specific driving environments.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and climbing ability in deep snow and challenging winter conditions.
- Impressive long-term durability and sidewall integrity over extended periods.
- Stable and sporty handling characteristics on dry pavement.
Cons
- Reports of excessive road noise during operation.
- Inconsistent performance on wet or cold surfaces, with some users noting a lack of grip.
- Sensitivity to rubber aging, which can significantly degrade performance if tires are not fresh.
Observations
- Users operating the tire on AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester report high satisfaction with stability and control across mixed winter conditions.
- The tire's performance profile is highly dependent on the age of the compound, suggesting that storage time prior to purchase is a critical factor for this specific model.
The Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is highly regarded by commercial van and motorhome operators for its exceptional durability, year-round versatility, and reliable traction in diverse weather conditions. Users consistently report that the tire provides a significant performance upgrade over standard commercial tires, offering impressive longevity and confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and cold environments.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong traction and handling in wet and cold weather conditions
- Excellent value proposition due to high mileage performance
- Confidence-inspiring stability for heavy-duty vehicles and motorhomes
Cons
- Reports of excessive sidewall flex or 'mushy' steering response
- Occasional low-frequency drone or noise during hard cornering
- Higher initial purchase price compared to midrange alternatives
Observations
- Motorhome owners report excellent performance stability even when fully loaded at 3.6-3.7 tons.
- Commercial van operators note significant improvements in grip and longevity compared to standard factory-fitted tires.
- The tire maintains consistent performance characteristics across extreme temperature ranges, from sub-zero conditions to 35°C heat.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Community opinion on the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is generally positive regarding its winter and wet traction capabilities for heavy vans and trucks, though users note potential trade-offs in rolling resistance and tread wear. Mention of a recall regarding snow traction also introduces mixed perspectives, while commercial vehicle and RV owners frequently consider it as a top alternative.
“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”
“Agilis cross climate (LT metric) Not a ton of information in regard to this tire, but so far my experience has been extremely positive. Great traction in the wet and light snow and fuel mileage seems to have improved. I plan to update this post as I put more miles on them. They don’t have the cool factor I concerned myself with as a younger man, but they seem to be an excellent tire. Read more”
“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
“Agilis CrossClimate all-weather cargo van tire So I had an electrician over to my house yesterday (in Michigan), and I saw his Ford Transit had the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate all-weather truck/van/cargo tire. I asked him how it was. He told me that the stock tires would get completely stuck even on plowed roads that had the tiniest bit of snow or ice left. But with the Agilis CrossClimate, he hadn't gotten stuck anymore. So I thought that was a cool story I would share. FYI, Toyo makes the Celsius Cargo, which is another all-weather tire for cargo vans and trucks. P.S. Some Agilis CrossClimate tires have a recall. Read more”
Based on 9 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Van |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better wet, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 93 vs 64 on wet.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 91 vs 64 on comfort.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 94 vs 80 on treadwear.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 97 vs 90 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.