78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on wet and comfort. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 is stronger on treadwear, snow and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM25 4X4 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 64 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM25 4X4 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 90 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 64 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM25 4X4 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM25 4X4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 77 |
| Dry | 88 | 90 |
| Wet | 83 | 64 |
| Snow | 81 | 90 |
| Comfort | 83 | 64 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 80 |
| Handling | 74 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 receives highly polarized feedback, with some users praising its exceptional grip and longevity in severe winter conditions, while others report significant concerns regarding noise levels and wet-weather performance. The disparity in user experience appears to be heavily influenced by the age of the rubber compound at the time of purchase and specific driving environments.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and climbing ability in deep snow and challenging winter conditions.
- Impressive long-term durability and sidewall integrity over extended periods.
- Stable and sporty handling characteristics on dry pavement.
Cons
- Reports of excessive road noise during operation.
- Inconsistent performance on wet or cold surfaces, with some users noting a lack of grip.
- Sensitivity to rubber aging, which can significantly degrade performance if tires are not fresh.
Observations
- Users operating the tire on AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester report high satisfaction with stability and control across mixed winter conditions.
- The tire's performance profile is highly dependent on the age of the compound, suggesting that storage time prior to purchase is a critical factor for this specific model.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
77
/ 100
Bridgestone
Too close to call: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra and Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra is stronger on wet and comfort. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 is stronger on treadwear, snow and handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 scores 80 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 scores 90 vs 81 on snow.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.