83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S is stronger on handling, comfort and treadwear. Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT is stronger on snow and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Blizzak LM30 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM30 RFT leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Blizzak LM30 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM30 RFT leads by 19
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Blizzak LM30 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 70 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Blizzak LM30 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Blizzak LM30 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 83 |
| Dry | 90 | 85 |
| Wet | 84 | 90 |
| Snow | 69 | 88 |
| Comfort | 87 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 75 |
| Handling | 90 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
- Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
- Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
- Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
- Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
- Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT is highly regarded for its exceptional winter traction, particularly in snowy and challenging road conditions. Users report significant improvements in mobility compared to standard tires, allowing for confident driving on uncleared surfaces.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and grip in deep snow
- Reliable performance on uncleared local roads
- Superior capability compared to non-winter tires on inclines
Cons
- Requires seasonal removal to preserve tread life
- Run-flat construction may influence ride characteristics
Observations
- Reported effective performance on rear-wheel-drive compact vehicles like the BMW 118d
- Demonstrated ability to outperform 4x4 vehicles equipped with non-specialized tires in snowy conditions
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
BFGoodrich
83
/ 100
Bridgestone
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S and Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S is stronger on handling, comfort and treadwear. Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT is stronger on snow and wet.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT scores 88 vs 69 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 87 vs 78 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 81 vs 75 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.