71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
68/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | All-Terrain T/A KO | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO | Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 84 |
| Dry | 84 | 87 |
| Wet | 64 | 87 |
| Snow | 70 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 83 |
| Handling | 68 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO is widely regarded as a legendary, highly durable tire that excels in off-road environments, snow, and high-mileage scenarios. While users consistently praise its rugged construction and longevity, there is a clear consensus regarding its limitations in wet weather, where grip can be unpredictable and prone to sudden breakaway.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability over high mileage
- Strong off-road traction in mud, snow, and varied terrain
- Robust construction capable of handling demanding environments
- Reliable performance in winter conditions
Cons
- Compromised wet road grip and handling
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Inconsistent performance in deep sand compared to softer compounds
- Potential for rapid tread wear in specific vehicle setups or alignment issues
Observations
- Users noted that light-duty pickup trucks with empty beds may experience reduced rear-end traction on wet roads.
- The tire's performance is highly dependent on vehicle aerodynamics and weight, with some users noting significant fuel economy impacts on less aerodynamic vehicles.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 is regarded as a highly capable performance winter tire that excels in wet and dry conditions while providing reliable traction in snow. Users generally find it to be a confidence-inspiring choice for daily winter driving, particularly for those transitioning from summer tires in regions with moderate to severe winter climates.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and handling in wet road conditions
- Strong performance and stability on snow-covered surfaces
- High level of ride comfort
- Significant improvement in winter mobility for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Cons
- Performance on pure ice is adequate but not class-leading
- Snow performance is rated as good rather than exceptional compared to dedicated deep-snow tires
Observations
- Rear-wheel-drive sedan owners report a transformative improvement in winter drivability and hill-start capability.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
BFGoodrich
84
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 87 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 80 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 80 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 83 vs 75 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM35
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.