Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 87 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 60 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 87 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 80 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 19 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 83 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Trail Terrain TA | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA | Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 84 |
| Dry | 80 | 87 |
| Wet | 61 | 87 |
| Snow | 90 | – |
| Comfort | 74 | 80 |
| Noise | 19 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 83 |
| Handling | 64 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Trail Terrain T/A receives a polarized reception, praised for its aesthetic appeal, impressive snow traction, and quiet highway performance. However, significant concerns regarding wet-weather handling and inconsistent tread longevity suggest that performance may vary considerably based on vehicle weight and driving conditions.
Pros
- Excellent traction and predictability in snow and ice conditions
- Quiet highway ride quality for an all-terrain tire
- Robust sidewall durability against rocky terrain
- Attractive visual design with white lettering options
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance and traction issues on paved surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
- Reports of excessive road noise on specific tarmac surfaces
Observations
- Users operating pickup trucks like the Toyota Hilux reported significant traction loss in wet conditions, suggesting potential issues with rear-wheel-drive bias vehicles.
- Hybrid SUV owners, such as those with the RAV4, reported high satisfaction with highway tread longevity and noise levels.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 is regarded as a highly capable performance winter tire that excels in wet and dry conditions while providing reliable traction in snow. Users generally find it to be a confidence-inspiring choice for daily winter driving, particularly for those transitioning from summer tires in regions with moderate to severe winter climates.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and handling in wet road conditions
- Strong performance and stability on snow-covered surfaces
- High level of ride comfort
- Significant improvement in winter mobility for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Cons
- Performance on pure ice is adequate but not class-leading
- Snow performance is rated as good rather than exceptional compared to dedicated deep-snow tires
Observations
- Rear-wheel-drive sedan owners report a transformative improvement in winter drivability and hill-start capability.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail Terrain TA | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 43 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 87 vs 61 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 80 vs 64 on handling.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 87 vs 80 on dry.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 80 vs 74 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.