75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
73/100
38 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
All Terrain TA KO2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM35 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | All Terrain TA KO2 | Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 84 |
| Dry | 82 | 87 |
| Wet | 67 | 87 |
| Snow | 81 | – |
| Comfort | 72 | 80 |
| Noise | 100 | – |
| Treadwear | 84 | 83 |
| Handling | 72 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 is widely regarded as a benchmark for off-road durability and rugged versatility, excelling in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain. While users praise its longevity and aggressive aesthetic, there is a consistent consensus regarding its declining performance in wet conditions and increased road noise as the rubber compound hardens over time.
Pros
- Exceptional off-road durability and puncture resistance
- Strong traction in gravel, sand, and rocky terrain
- Long tread life and high mileage capability
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality as the tire ages
- Rubber compound tends to harden, negatively impacting cold-weather and wet-surface traction
- Poor performance on ice and hard-packed snow
Observations
- Users with lighter vehicles or vans (e.g., Sprinter) report varying experiences with noise and comfort, often noting that the tire's weight impacts ride quality.
- Owners of heavy-duty 4x4s and trucks frequently highlight the tire's ability to handle high-speed gravel and heavy loads without structural failure.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 is regarded as a highly capable performance winter tire that excels in wet and dry conditions while providing reliable traction in snow. Users generally find it to be a confidence-inspiring choice for daily winter driving, particularly for those transitioning from summer tires in regions with moderate to severe winter climates.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and handling in wet road conditions
- Strong performance and stability on snow-covered surfaces
- High level of ride comfort
- Significant improvement in winter mobility for rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Cons
- Performance on pure ice is adequate but not class-leading
- Snow performance is rated as good rather than exceptional compared to dedicated deep-snow tires
Observations
- Rear-wheel-drive sedan owners report a transformative improvement in winter drivability and hill-start capability.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13 - 15/32″ | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
BFGoodrich
84
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 87 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 80 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 80 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 scores 87 vs 82 on dry.
Tire A · BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM35
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM35 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.