68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
69 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Firestone Multihawk 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Firestone Multihawk 2 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Multihawk 2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP150 | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP150 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP150 | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 52 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP150 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP150 | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP150 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP150 | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 52 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Multihawk 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP150 | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 75 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 | Firestone Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 62 |
| Dry | 75 | 82 |
| Wet | 68 | 52 |
| Comfort | 68 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 52 |
| Handling | 67 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Tire A
62
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 is a polarizing tire that serves primarily as an original equipment (OE) fitment for compact and hybrid vehicles. While many users appreciate its comfort and durability for daily commuting, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding wet-weather traction and inconsistent tread life. Consensus suggests it is a competent choice for conservative, dry-weather driving, but it often fails to meet expectations for those seeking premium performance or superior fuel economy.
Pros
- High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
- Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
- Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving
- Good longevity for some users, with reports of 40,000+ km usage
Cons
- Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
- Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
- Disappointing real-world fuel economy compared to marketing claims
Observations
- Users with hybrid vehicles (e.g., Honda Civic Hybrid, Suzuki Swace) frequently reported that the tire failed to deliver expected fuel efficiency gains.
- Drivers of light hatchbacks and compact sedans (e.g., Toyota Corolla, Nissan Tilda) noted a significant disparity in satisfaction, with some praising the comfort while others criticized the lack of steering feedback and wet grip.
- Several reports from owners in regions with poor road infrastructure suggest the tire is robust against impact damage, though others reported sidewall cracking.
The Firestone Multihawk 2 is generally regarded as a budget-friendly, dry-weather performer that offers good comfort and low noise levels. However, it receives significant criticism for its performance in wet conditions, with multiple users reporting dangerous levels of traction loss and unpredictable handling during rain.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High levels of ride comfort
- Low road noise
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and tendency to slide on wet surfaces
- Lack of audible feedback when reaching the limit of grip
- Concerns regarding tread wear longevity
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are highly dependent on climate, with dry-weather satisfaction being high in arid regions.
- Drivers reported significant rear-end instability when the tires were fitted to the rear axle in wet conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 | B · Firestone Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Bridgestone
62
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Firestone Multihawk 2 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 scores 68 vs 52 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 scores 65 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Multihawk 2 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Multihawk 2 scores 82 vs 75 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Tire B · Firestone Multihawk 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 also compared with
Firestone Multihawk 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.