62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Firestone Multihawk 2 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Multihawk 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 62 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Multihawk 2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Multihawk 2 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 61 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Multihawk 2 | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 71 |
| Dry | 82 | 76 |
| Wet | 52 | 62 |
| Comfort | 64 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 77 |
| Handling | 75 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 8% #12/14 · 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 | 4% #28/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | +4.8 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Multihawk 2 is generally regarded as a budget-friendly, dry-weather performer that offers good comfort and low noise levels. However, it receives significant criticism for its performance in wet conditions, with multiple users reporting dangerous levels of traction loss and unpredictable handling during rain.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High levels of ride comfort
- Low road noise
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and tendency to slide on wet surfaces
- Lack of audible feedback when reaching the limit of grip
- Concerns regarding tread wear longevity
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are highly dependent on climate, with dry-weather satisfaction being high in arid regions.
- Drivers reported significant rear-end instability when the tires were fitted to the rear axle in wet conditions.
The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
- Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
- High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
- Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Multihawk 2 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Firestone
71
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Firestone Multihawk 2 if handling and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 77 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 80 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Multihawk 2 scores 75 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 62 vs 52 on wet.
Tire A · Firestone Multihawk 2
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Multihawk 2 also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.