81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone Multihawk 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Destination HP — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 82 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 52 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 52 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 75 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination HP | Firestone Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 62 |
| Dry | 90 | 82 |
| Wet | 90 | 52 |
| Comfort | 90 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 52 |
| Handling | 85 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
62
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Destination HP receives mixed feedback, characterized by high praise for its versatile off-road and towing capabilities versus concerns regarding tread longevity. While some users report exceptional durability over high mileage, others note premature wear, particularly on the outer edges during regular cornering.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
- Strong performance while towing heavy loads
- Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
- Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
- Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
Observations
- Users operating on Land Rover Freelander 2 platforms reported significant outer-edge wear, suggesting sensitivity to cornering forces.
- The tire demonstrates high durability for heavy-duty towing applications, with some users achieving over 70,000 km of service.
The Firestone Multihawk 2 is generally regarded as a budget-friendly, dry-weather performer that offers good comfort and low noise levels. However, it receives significant criticism for its performance in wet conditions, with multiple users reporting dangerous levels of traction loss and unpredictable handling during rain.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High levels of ride comfort
- Low road noise
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Unpredictable handling and tendency to slide on wet surfaces
- Lack of audible feedback when reaching the limit of grip
- Concerns regarding tread wear longevity
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are highly dependent on climate, with dry-weather satisfaction being high in arid regions.
- Drivers reported significant rear-end instability when the tires were fitted to the rear axle in wet conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination HP | B · Firestone Multihawk 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Firestone
62
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Destination HP — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 52 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 64 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Destination HP scores 85 vs 75 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 82 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone Destination HP
Tire B · Firestone Multihawk 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Destination HP also compared with
Firestone Multihawk 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.