81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Firestone Destination HP vs Firestone RoadHawk — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
66/100
44 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Destination HP — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 39 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 71 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 55 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Destination HP | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 63 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination HP | Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 66 |
| Dry | 90 | 84 |
| Wet | 90 | 75 |
| Comfort | 90 | 52 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 55 |
| Handling | 85 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone Destination HP receives mixed feedback, characterized by high praise for its versatile off-road and towing capabilities versus concerns regarding tread longevity. While some users report exceptional durability over high mileage, others note premature wear, particularly on the outer edges during regular cornering.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
- Strong performance while towing heavy loads
- Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
- Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
- Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
Observations
- Users operating on Land Rover Freelander 2 platforms reported significant outer-edge wear, suggesting sensitivity to cornering forces.
- The tire demonstrates high durability for heavy-duty towing applications, with some users achieving over 70,000 km of service.
The Firestone RoadHawk is a polarizing mid-range tire that excels in comfort and wet-weather grip for daily commuting but suffers from significant durability concerns. While many users praise its value and performance on smaller, lighter vehicles, a substantial portion of owners report rapid, uneven tread wear and soft sidewalls that compromise handling precision during spirited driving.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Competitive price point compared to premium brands
- Effective performance for standard, non-sporty daily driving
Cons
- Rapid and often uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'mushy' feel and visual appearance of under-inflation
- Lack of steering feedback and precision in cornering
- Reports of premature cracking or perishing in low-mileage scenarios
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, Golf) report higher satisfaction regarding comfort and handling compared to owners of heavier diesel estates or vans.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles frequently report significant sidewall deflection and poor cornering confidence, often requiring higher tire pressures to compensate.
- The tire is frequently criticized for lack of stability when fitted to commercial vans, with users noting a 'wobbling' sensation under load.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination HP | B · Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Firestone
66
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Destination HP — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone Destination HP scores 85 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 84 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone Destination HP
Tire B · Firestone RoadHawk
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone Destination HP also compared with
Firestone RoadHawk also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.