69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
66/100
44 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Firestone RoadHawk vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
75/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
65/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Firestone RoadHawk if noise and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 77 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 91% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 65 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 90% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 94% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 39 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 64 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 68 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 65 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone RoadHawk | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 71 |
| Dry | 84 | 78 |
| Wet | 75 | 77 |
| Comfort | 52 | 64 |
| Noise | 91 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 68 |
| Handling | 63 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #2/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #9/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | -0.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 91% #6/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | +6.1 | Same test |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% #4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 78% #3/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | +19.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #13/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 95% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | +3 | Same test |
| Price | Other | 74% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 87% #4/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | -12.9 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 8% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 20% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | -11.7 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 95% #10/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | +2.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #13/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 96% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | -6 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #2/7 · 2019 NAF Summer Tyre Test | 94% #8/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | +4.6 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone RoadHawk is a polarizing mid-range tire that excels in comfort and wet-weather grip for daily commuting but suffers from significant durability concerns. While many users praise its value and performance on smaller, lighter vehicles, a substantial portion of owners report rapid, uneven tread wear and soft sidewalls that compromise handling precision during spirited driving.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Competitive price point compared to premium brands
- Effective performance for standard, non-sporty daily driving
Cons
- Rapid and often uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'mushy' feel and visual appearance of under-inflation
- Lack of steering feedback and precision in cornering
- Reports of premature cracking or perishing in low-mileage scenarios
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, Golf) report higher satisfaction regarding comfort and handling compared to owners of heavier diesel estates or vans.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles frequently report significant sidewall deflection and poor cornering confidence, often requiring higher tire pressures to compensate.
- The tire is frequently criticized for lack of stability when fitted to commercial vans, with users noting a 'wobbling' sensation under load.
The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, value-oriented tire that offers competent dry-weather performance and respectable longevity for daily commuting. While many users appreciate its affordability and fuel efficiency, the consensus is polarized regarding its noise levels and wet-weather confidence, with several reports of premature road noise and inconsistent grip in adverse conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good dry-weather traction and handling
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Stiff ride quality and lack of comfort
- Potential for premature dry rot or accelerated wear in specific conditions
Observations
- Users transitioning from larger wheels (17-inch) to smaller diameters (15-inch) reported a significant reduction in road noise.
- Drivers of light city vehicles reported better-than-average tread longevity compared to heavier or more powerful vehicle applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone RoadHawk | B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone
71
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Firestone RoadHawk if noise and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Firestone RoadHawk scores 91 vs 72 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 68 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 64 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone RoadHawk scores 84 vs 78 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone RoadHawk
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone RoadHawk also compared with
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.