69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
66/100
44 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Firestone RoadHawk vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
11 professional tests
User signal (40%)
67/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone RoadHawk — better noise, wet and handling. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 78 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 94% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 63 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 82% | 88% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 70% | 67% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 99% | 92% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
S fit EQ leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 39 | 42 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 34
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 57 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
S fit EQ leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | RoadHawk | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 57 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone RoadHawk | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 66 |
| Dry | 84 | 81 |
| Wet | 75 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 52 | 55 |
| Noise | 91 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 74 |
| Handling | 63 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 92% #8/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 81% #9/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | +11.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #18/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 93% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -1.6 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 76% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -12 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 100% #47/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #40/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +1.7 | Same test |
| Abrasion | Other | 55% #9/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 77% #46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -22.3 | Same test |
| Noise | Other | 100% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #12/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +1.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 74% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 50% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | +24.4 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 73% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 71% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +1.8 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 66% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 7% #14/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | +9.5 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #6/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 96% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.4 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 56% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | -44.4 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 83% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -12.4 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 0% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #32/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 88% #19/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | -5.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 70% #29/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 67% #21/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +2.2 | Same test |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 92% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +6.9 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone RoadHawk is a polarizing mid-range tire that excels in comfort and wet-weather grip for daily commuting but suffers from significant durability concerns. While many users praise its value and performance on smaller, lighter vehicles, a substantial portion of owners report rapid, uneven tread wear and soft sidewalls that compromise handling precision during spirited driving.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Competitive price point compared to premium brands
- Effective performance for standard, non-sporty daily driving
Cons
- Rapid and often uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'mushy' feel and visual appearance of under-inflation
- Lack of steering feedback and precision in cornering
- Reports of premature cracking or perishing in low-mileage scenarios
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, Golf) report higher satisfaction regarding comfort and handling compared to owners of heavier diesel estates or vans.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles frequently report significant sidewall deflection and poor cornering confidence, often requiring higher tire pressures to compensate.
- The tire is frequently criticized for lack of stability when fitted to commercial vans, with users noting a 'wobbling' sensation under load.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers significant value for casual drivers but struggles to meet the performance demands of spirited or aggressive motorists. While many users praise its quiet ride and cost-effectiveness, others report inconsistent wet-weather traction, flimsy sidewalls, and premature road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
- Competent dry-weather grip for standard driving conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency reported by some users
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction prone to bubbles and punctures
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
- Lack of steering feedback and poor handling during aggressive cornering
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
Observations
- Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Renault Sport Clio, suffer from significant sidewall flex and 'wobble' during spirited driving.
- Heavier vehicles or those driven at high speeds (above 170 km/h) may experience overheating and loss of grip due to the soft rubber compound.
- Users noted that the tire is better suited for light, casual city driving rather than high-performance or heavy-load applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone RoadHawk | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone
66
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Firestone RoadHawk — better noise, wet and handling. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Firestone RoadHawk scores 91 vs 57 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S fit EQ scores 74 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone RoadHawk scores 75 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Firestone RoadHawk scores 63 vs 57 on handling.
Tire A · Firestone RoadHawk
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone RoadHawk also compared with
Laufenn S fit EQ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.