82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Dynapro AT M vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
11 professional tests
User signal (40%)
67/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Dynapro AT M — better comfort, handling and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 78 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 42 |
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 57 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Dynapro AT M leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Dynapro AT M | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 57 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT M | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 66 |
| Dry | 87 | 81 |
| Wet | 78 | 68 |
| Snow | 72 | 66 |
| Comfort | 84 | 55 |
| Noise | 82 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 74 |
| Handling | 86 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers significant value for casual drivers but struggles to meet the performance demands of spirited or aggressive motorists. While many users praise its quiet ride and cost-effectiveness, others report inconsistent wet-weather traction, flimsy sidewalls, and premature road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
- Competent dry-weather grip for standard driving conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency reported by some users
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction prone to bubbles and punctures
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
- Lack of steering feedback and poor handling during aggressive cornering
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
Observations
- Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Renault Sport Clio, suffer from significant sidewall flex and 'wobble' during spirited driving.
- Heavier vehicles or those driven at high speeds (above 170 km/h) may experience overheating and loss of grip due to the soft rubber compound.
- Users noted that the tire is better suited for light, casual city driving rather than high-performance or heavy-load applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT M | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Hankook
66
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Hankook Dynapro AT M — better comfort, handling and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 84 vs 55 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 86 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 82 vs 57 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro AT M scores 86 vs 74 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT M
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Dynapro AT M also compared with
Laufenn S fit EQ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.