80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
94/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
250 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
11 professional tests
User signal (40%)
67/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 78 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 63 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 93% | 88% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 92% | 91% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 92% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
S fit EQ leads by 14
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 42 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 57 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 57 |
| DriverReviews owners | 88 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 66 |
| Dry | 88 | 81 |
| Wet | 90 | 68 |
| Snow | 52 | 66 |
| Comfort | 82 | 55 |
| Noise | 72 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 74 |
| Handling | 88 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 100% #1/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 77% #20/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | +23.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 94% #8/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | +3.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #5/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.1 | Same test |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -15.3 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 97% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #4/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -0.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 58% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 50% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | +8.3 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 61% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 80% #10/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -18.5 | Same test |
| Wear | Other | 100% #1/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 61% #14/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +39.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/14 · 2021 Tyre Reviews UHP Summer Tyre Test | 3% #39/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +47.4 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 97% #3/8 · 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | 98% #18/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | -0.2 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #1/3 · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs SuperSport vs SuperSport R | 100% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 91% #8/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | -4.3 | Same test |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #12/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 88% #19/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | +5.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 92% #4/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 91% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #7/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | 92% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +5.3 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong braking performance
- Good rim protection features
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
- Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
- Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
- Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
- Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers significant value for casual drivers but struggles to meet the performance demands of spirited or aggressive motorists. While many users praise its quiet ride and cost-effectiveness, others report inconsistent wet-weather traction, flimsy sidewalls, and premature road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
- Competent dry-weather grip for standard driving conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency reported by some users
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction prone to bubbles and punctures
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
- Lack of steering feedback and poor handling during aggressive cornering
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
Observations
- Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Renault Sport Clio, suffer from significant sidewall flex and 'wobble' during spirited driving.
- Heavier vehicles or those driven at high speeds (above 170 km/h) may experience overheating and loss of grip due to the soft rubber compound.
- Users noted that the tire is better suited for light, casual city driving rather than high-performance or heavy-load applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 300 - 500 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Goodyear
66
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 88 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 55 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 72 vs 57 on noise.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 also compared with
Laufenn S fit EQ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.