Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Goodyear

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Summer Max Performance tires

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
88/100
29 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
193 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
88
Snow
–
Comfort
68
Noise
49
Treadwear
74
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Laufenn

Laufenn S fit EQ

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Laufenn S fit EQ tread pattern
Objective (60%)
68/100
11 professional tests
User signal (40%)
67/100
14 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
68
Snow
66
Comfort
55
Noise
57
Treadwear
74
Handling
57

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if noise matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 leads by 9
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
90
B — Laufenn S fit EQ
81
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 83
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 94 78
Dry Braking (% of best) 95% 93%
Dry Handling (% of best) 97% 99%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 leads by 20
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
88
B — Laufenn S fit EQ
68
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
Professional tests (TWG score) 86 71
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 63
Wet Braking (% of best) 94% 84%
Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) 65% 67%
Wet Circle (% of best) 98% 97%
Wet Handling (% of best) 100% 92%

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
–
B — Laufenn S fit EQ
66

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 leads by 13
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
68
B — Laufenn S fit EQ
55
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
Professional tests (TWG score) 59 42
Tire Rack owners 88 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 73

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S fit EQ leads by 8
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
49
B — Laufenn S fit EQ
57
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
Professional tests (TWG score) 49 57

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
74
B — Laufenn S fit EQ
74
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
Tire Rack owners 80 –
Tyre Reviews owners 74 73

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 leads by 31
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
88
B — Laufenn S fit EQ
57
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
Tyre Reviews owners 88 57
DriverReviews owners 86 –

Scores at a glance

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Laufenn S fit EQ: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Laufenn S fit EQ
Relative Score 77 66
Dry 90 81
Wet 88 68
Snow – 66
Comfort 68 55
Noise 49 57
Treadwear 74 74
Handling 88 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 100% #1/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test 81% #9/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test +19 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 95% #13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? 93% #16/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +1.7 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #3/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test -2.6 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% #3/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test -0.3 Different tests
Fuel Consumption Fuel 97% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 98% #40/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -1.8 Different tests
Abrasion Other 75% #3/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested 77% #46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -2.2 Different tests
Noise Other 96% #2/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 94% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test +2 Different tests
Price Other 86% #4/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested 50% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test +35.9 Different tests
Value Other 74% #9/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 58% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +16.1 Different tests
Wear Other 68% #3/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test -4.2 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 25% #4/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test 7% #14/17 · 2021 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 +17.9 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 95% #6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 96% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test -1.2 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 90% #6/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test 50% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test +40 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 80% #3/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test -15.7 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #8/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test 0% #3/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 94% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 84% #29/48 · 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview +10.2 Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete Wet 65% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 67% #21/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -2.4 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 98% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test 97% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +1 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #2/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test 92% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +7.5 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier ultra-high-performance tire that excels in balancing daily comfort with impressive wet and dry grip. Most users report a significant improvement in handling, noise levels, and ride quality compared to their previous tires, making it a highly competitive and often more affordable alternative to premium rivals like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip with predictable handling at the limit.
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise for a performance-oriented tire.
  • Strong value proposition compared to other premium UHP brands.
  • Excellent steering responsiveness and feedback.
  • Effective rim protection design.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by many users, particularly under spirited driving.
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' or floaty feeling during aggressive cornering.
  • Some reports of high road noise on rough or non-smooth asphalt surfaces.
  • Performance can be inconsistent until the tires reach optimal operating temperature.

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 6 consistently report a transformative improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in tramlining.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups often report faster-than-expected tread wear on the rear axle.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda MX-5, Suzuki Swift) frequently praise the tire's agility and progressive behavior at the limit.
Tire B Laufenn S fit EQ

The Laufenn S Fit EQ is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers significant value for casual drivers but struggles to meet the performance demands of spirited or aggressive motorists. While many users praise its quiet ride and cost-effectiveness, others report inconsistent wet-weather traction, flimsy sidewalls, and premature road noise as the tread wears down.

Pros

  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
  • Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
  • Competent dry-weather grip for standard driving conditions
  • Improved fuel efficiency reported by some users

Cons

  • Weak sidewall construction prone to bubbles and punctures
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor handling during aggressive cornering
  • Increased road noise as the tire wears

Observations

  • Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Renault Sport Clio, suffer from significant sidewall flex and 'wobble' during spirited driving.
  • Heavier vehicles or those driven at high speeds (above 170 km/h) may experience overheating and loss of grip due to the soft rubber compound.
  • Users noted that the tire is better suited for light, casual city driving rather than high-performance or heavy-load applications.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Positive

Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with many drivers praising its balance of performance, wet/dry grip, and pricing compared to direct competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While a few users noted concerns regarding comfort, cold-weather performance in tests, or potential high-speed vibrations, the vast majority recommend them as top-tier daily driving and spirited performance tires.

r/TyreReviews ·4 upvotes ·2026-08-22

“215/45 R17 — Primacy 4+ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 for a daily driver My current tyres have developed deep cracks so they need replacing. The annoying part is that half the tyres people recommend simply don't exist in 215/45 R17, which cuts the list down fast. The two that keep coming up are the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, but they seem built for completely different drivers. Context: 2024 skoda Fabia 1.5 TSI. I'm not a sporty driver commuting and errands, occasionally push the pedal on an on-ramp, nothing crazy. Hot dry climate with heavy rain in winter and zero snow, so summer tyres only. What I actually want is longevity, comfort and solid wet grip. Quiet would be a bonus. Is the Asymmetric 6 just overkill for how I drive? And is there anything else in this size I should be looking at Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·3 upvotes ·2026-08-05

“Goodyear EfficentGrip Performance 2 vs. Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I'm struggling to choose between the two as there is currently a deal on which means the difference in price is only £5 per tyre. I think that means the Asy6 is the no brainer, but my use case doesn't call for a UHP. I value comfort, road noise and resistance to dry cracking over anything else. I don't do many miles. I've already got the Asy6 on the rear axle (came with the wheels) and I'm looking to buy 2 new tyres for the front. I'll need rears at some point probably in the next year. I'd like my car to be more comfortable on broken roads, but I don't think the tyres are the main issue. The car is a Merc C180 estate family car. With 2 young kids, I don't exactly push the car hard. It mostly sits on the motorway or pootles around town. Am I overthinking it? Fronts: 225/45/17 Rears: 245/40/17”

r/TyreReviews ·1 upvote ·2026-08-22

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-12-06

“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Comparison with Michelin#Daily driving comfort#Wear and durability#Value and pricing#Track usage limitations

Based on 21 community posts

Tire B

Laufenn S fit EQ

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 B · Laufenn S fit EQ
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available98—
Rim diameters17″ – 23″—
Tread depth7 - 9/32″—
UTQG260 - 300 AA A—
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear

Laufenn

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 88 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 88 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 68 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 81 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.