Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 78 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 99% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 91% | 99% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 63 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 93% | 88% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 94% | 98% |
Snow
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 42 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 73 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | 57 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 73 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 57 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 66 |
| Dry | 78 | 81 |
| Wet | 77 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 64 | 55 |
| Noise | 72 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 74 |
| Handling | 65 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #9/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 94% #8/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | +4.5 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 91% #6/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -8.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% #3/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -10.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #2/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test | 94% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +3.9 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 87% #4/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 67% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +20.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 11% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +8.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #10/11 · 2021 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 96% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #5/15 · 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test | 88% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +5.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #8/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 98% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -4.3 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, value-oriented tire that offers competent dry-weather performance and respectable longevity for daily commuting. While many users appreciate its affordability and fuel efficiency, the consensus is polarized regarding its noise levels and wet-weather confidence, with several reports of premature road noise and inconsistent grip in adverse conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good dry-weather traction and handling
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Stiff ride quality and lack of comfort
- Potential for premature dry rot or accelerated wear in specific conditions
Observations
- Users transitioning from larger wheels (17-inch) to smaller diameters (15-inch) reported a significant reduction in road noise.
- Drivers of light city vehicles reported better-than-average tread longevity compared to heavier or more powerful vehicle applications.
The Laufenn S Fit EQ is a polarizing budget-tier tire that offers significant value for casual drivers but struggles to meet the performance demands of spirited or aggressive motorists. While many users praise its quiet ride and cost-effectiveness, others report inconsistent wet-weather traction, flimsy sidewalls, and premature road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting
- Competent dry-weather grip for standard driving conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency reported by some users
Cons
- Weak sidewall construction prone to bubbles and punctures
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance and traction
- Lack of steering feedback and poor handling during aggressive cornering
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
Observations
- Performance-oriented vehicles, such as the Renault Sport Clio, suffer from significant sidewall flex and 'wobble' during spirited driving.
- Heavier vehicles or those driven at high speeds (above 170 km/h) may experience overheating and loss of grip due to the soft rubber compound.
- Users noted that the tire is better suited for light, casual city driving rather than high-performance or heavy-load applications.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Laufenn
Winner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better noise, wet and comfort. Pick the Laufenn S fit EQ if treadwear and dry matter most to you.
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 72 vs 57 on noise.
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 77 vs 68 on wet.
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 64 vs 55 on comfort.
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 65 vs 57 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.