86
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Firestone Destination HP — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Firestone Destination HP if wet and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Destination HP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Destination HP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Destination HP leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Destination HP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Destination HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Destination HP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Firestone Destination HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 81 |
| Dry | 90 | 90 |
| Wet | 84 | 90 |
| Snow | 69 | – |
| Comfort | 87 | 90 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 60 |
| Handling | 90 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
86
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
- Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
- Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
- Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
- Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
- Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
The Firestone Destination HP receives mixed feedback, characterized by high praise for its versatile off-road and towing capabilities versus concerns regarding tread longevity. While some users report exceptional durability over high mileage, others note premature wear, particularly on the outer edges during regular cornering.
Pros
- Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
- Strong performance while towing heavy loads
- Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
- Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
- Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
Observations
- Users operating on Land Rover Freelander 2 platforms reported significant outer-edge wear, suggesting sensitivity to cornering forces.
- The tire demonstrates high durability for heavy-duty towing applications, with some users achieving over 70,000 km of service.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Firestone Destination HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
86
/ 100
BFGoodrich
81
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Firestone Destination HP if wet and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 81 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 84 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 85 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination HP scores 90 vs 87 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Firestone Destination HP
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S also compared with
Firestone Destination HP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.