66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 Plus leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 74 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 62 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 54 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 77 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 72 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 53 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 Plus | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 61 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 71 |
| Dry | 74 | 76 |
| Wet | 66 | 62 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 71 | 80 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 63 | 77 |
| Handling | 55 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus is a polarizing tire that excels in fuel efficiency and initial comfort but frequently disappoints users regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance. While many owners appreciate its low rolling resistance and quiet ride when new, a significant portion of the user base reports premature wear and a noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy due to low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and noise suppression when new
- Predictable handling for daily commuting and highway driving
- Good dry traction for standard, non-spirited driving
Cons
- Significant premature tread wear failing to meet mileage expectations
- Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
- Increased road noise and vibration as the tire wears
- Lack of grip during spirited driving or in heavy rain
Observations
- SUV and Crossover owners (e.g., Mazda CX-9, Subaru Forester) frequently report that the tire's sidewall stiffness and grip limits are insufficient for the vehicle's weight and handling characteristics.
- Users of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., VW Jetta, Toyota Yaris) tend to report higher satisfaction with comfort and noise levels compared to those driving larger SUVs.
- Multiple reports indicate that the tire's performance degrades significantly after the first 20,000–30,000 miles, particularly regarding noise and vibration.
The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
- Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
- High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
- Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Bridgestone
71
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 77 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 80 vs 71 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 61 vs 55 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 66 vs 62 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.