67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
199 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus V4 ES H105 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus V4 ES H105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus V4 ES H105 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus V4 ES H105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | 76 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus V4 ES H105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | 47 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus V4 ES H105 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus V4 ES H105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 75 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus V4 ES H105 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus V4 ES H105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 70 | 81 |
| Wet | 71 | 76 |
| Snow | 61 | 47 |
| Comfort | 72 | 75 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | 73 |
| Handling | 64 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in dry and wet road conditions. While many users praise its quiet ride and responsive handling, there is a strong consensus that it performs poorly in snow and ice, despite its all-season classification. Long-term reliability is mixed, with some users reporting excellent tread life and others citing premature wear, noise issues, or structural defects like bubbles and belt separation.
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet road traction
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium brands
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Sporty aesthetic and responsive cornering stability
Cons
- Very poor performance in snow and ice conditions
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Reports of structural issues including sidewall bubbles and belt separation
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear or cupping
Observations
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles like the Nissan 350Z and Infiniti G35 report high satisfaction with dry grip, though some note that the tire's soft sidewall can lead to 'slushy' steering response.
- Users in regions with poor road infrastructure (e.g., NY/NJ) frequently report sidewall bubbles, suggesting the tire may be vulnerable to pothole damage.
- Drivers of heavier or AWD vehicles often find the tire adequate for rain, but consistently warn against using it for winter driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | B · Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | High Performance All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 420 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Bridgestone
71
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 — better dry, treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 scores 61 vs 47 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 scores 81 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 scores 73 vs 62 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 scores 76 vs 71 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 also compared with
Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.