72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE-71R leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 99 | 97 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE-71R leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 48 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan A050 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 41 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE-71R leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 52 | 35 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE-71R | Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 92 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 61 |
| Dry | 99 | 97 |
| Wet | 81 | 48 |
| Comfort | 41 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 35 |
| Handling | 92 | 92 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
61
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE71R is widely regarded as a benchmark 200TW tire that dominated the autocross and track day scene for years due to its exceptional dry grip and rapid heat-up characteristics. While users praise its performance and consistent handling, it is frequently noted for its short tread life, high noise levels, and a tendency to feel imprecise or 'mushy' at the absolute limit compared to newer competitors.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and turn-in precision
- Fast heat-up time ideal for autocross
- Consistent performance throughout the tire's lifespan
- Strong wet weather capability for a performance-oriented compound
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- High road noise levels
- Lack of audible feedback at the limit
- Can feel 'mushy' or imprecise under extreme track conditions
Observations
- Users running 17-inch setups on older sports cars like the Porsche Boxster reported significant improvements in handling and reduced ABS intervention compared to all-season tires.
- High-horsepower applications (e.g., 450hp GC8) benefit from the aggressive grip but contribute to faster degradation of the soft compound.
The Yokohama Advan A050 is widely regarded as a premier R-spec semi-slick tire, offering class-leading dry grip and exceptional handling feedback for time attack and track-focused enthusiasts. While users praise its consistent performance and predictable nature, they acknowledge that its high cost and rapid tread wear necessitate a dedicated use case, as it is not optimized for wet conditions or daily commuting.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
- Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
- Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
- Rapid warm-up time providing confidence from cold
Cons
- Very high price point compared to competitors
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
- Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
- Compound-dependent performance variability
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on suspension tuning, as the extreme grip levels can overwhelm poorly set-up vehicles.
- Front-wheel drive users reported significantly faster wear on front tires compared to the rear, with an estimated lifespan of 5,000 km to 7,000 km.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | B · Yokohama Advan A050 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Bridgestone
61
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R scores 81 vs 48 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan A050 scores 64 vs 41 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R scores 52 vs 35 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R also compared with
Yokohama Advan A050 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.