58
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
53/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE92A vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Yokohama
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE92A leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE92A | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport AS leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE92A | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 73 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE92A | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport AS leads by 60
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE92A | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE92A | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport AS leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE92A | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Advan Sport AS leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE92A | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE92A | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 73 |
| Dry | 80 | 77 |
| Wet | 60 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 20 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 71 |
| Handling | 70 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
- Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
- Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
- Potential for stability issues at highway speeds
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
- One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
- Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE92A | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Bridgestone
73
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better comfort, treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE92A if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 20 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 71 vs 60 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 67 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza RE92A scores 80 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE92A also compared with
Yokohama Advan Sport AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.