71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
69/100
176 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Bridgestone RE11A — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone RE11A — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
RE11A leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
RE11A leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
RE11A leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 34 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
RE11A leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 62 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
RE11A leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S001 | RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 88 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Bridgestone RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 81 |
| Dry | 83 | 90 |
| Wet | 82 | 85 |
| Comfort | 45 | 80 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 70 |
| Handling | 74 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S001 is a polarizing performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling and steering precision but frequently disappoints users regarding comfort and wet-weather confidence. While many drivers appreciate its stiff sidewalls and sporty feedback, a significant portion of the user base reports excessive road noise, rapid tread wear, and unpredictable traction in damp or cold conditions.
Pros
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering stability.
- Sharp, responsive steering feedback and turn-in precision.
- Strong rim protection due to robust sidewall construction.
- Predictable performance when pushed in warm, dry environments.
Cons
- High levels of road noise and cabin drone, especially as the tire wears.
- Poor wet-weather performance, with many reports of sudden traction loss and hydroplaning.
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, often failing to meet mileage expectations.
- Harsh ride quality, particularly on rough or uneven road surfaces.
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 frequently report that the tire feels too stiff and lacks the necessary wet-weather compliance for the chassis.
- Drivers of high-torque vehicles (e.g., VW Golf GTI, BMW 340i) often note significant wheel spin and traction control intervention in the wet.
- Users with 18-inch and 19-inch fitments frequently complain about the harshness and noise, noting that the tire transmits every road imperfection into the cabin.
The Bridgestone RE11A is highly regarded by enthusiasts for its exceptional dry grip and sharp handling characteristics. Users frequently praise its surprisingly refined noise levels and stiff sidewall construction, which provides superior steering feedback compared to other performance-oriented tires.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Surprisingly quiet and refined road noise levels
- Stiff sidewall construction providing sharp steering response
- Competent wet weather performance
Cons
- Stiff sidewalls may be perceived as harsh by some drivers
- Limited long-term tread life data available from current users
Observations
- Users transitioning from Michelin Pilot Super Sports (PSS) report a noticeable improvement in steering feel and refinement.
- The tire is noted for maintaining high performance levels even when purchased as used sets with significant remaining tread.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Community opinion on the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is divided, with some users praising their dry grip and stability, while many others criticize their rapid wear, stiffness (especially run-flat variants), noise, and cracking issues. Owners frequently compare them unfavorably to alternatives like Michelin or Pirelli, though budget-friendly deals tend to draw occasional interest.
r/BMWi3
·27 upvotes ·2024-01-09
“Mount all 4 tires Bridgestone Potenza S001 215/45R20 on i3s stock rims 5.5” front 15mm spacers and 6.5” rear After much convincing I have mounted all four tires of the same size purchased on TireRack for $83 each on i3s stock staggered rims. Smooth and stable. Looking gooddddddd!”
r/TyreReviews
·3 upvotes ·2026-02-22
“Replacing Bridgestone Potenza s001 RunFlats with Primacy 5 vs. PS5. Suggestions? I drive a VW Jetta which only has 160 Hp. I do occasionally really enjoy some spirited driving or taking aggressive turns. My considerations are that I do really care about Comfort and road noise and so that leads me towards the Primacy 5. At the same time, I don't think the power of my car justifies the PS5. My question is basically, I've online that for runflats to be runflats they have really stiff sidewalls, which might be contributing to the current feel of my car and I wonder if, even though everything else about the Potenza s001 is quite worse compared to the Primacy 5, I wonder if I will miss the stiff sidewall? And just because of that should I consider the PS5?”
r/CarTalkUK
·2 upvotes ·2023-11-15
“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”
r/BMWi3
·1 upvote ·2024-01-09
“I put the Potenza S001 tires on the rear of my i3s with that Tire Rack deal but I didn't think they would fit on the 5.5 inch rims. I think the rears are 6.0".”
Top themes
#Tread Wear and Longevity#Run-Flat Stiffness and Comfort#Road Noise and Harshness#Dry Grip and Stability#Quality and Cracking Issues#Value and Deals
Based on 16 community posts
Tire B
Bridgestone RE11A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Bridgestone RE11A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 15 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Bridgestone
81
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone RE11A — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone RE11A scores 80 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone RE11A scores 88 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone RE11A scores 90 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone RE11A scores 85 vs 82 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001
Tire B · Bridgestone RE11A
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza S001 also compared with
Bridgestone RE11A also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.