83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
79 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza S007A vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza S007A — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4 if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N FERA SUR4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007A | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Potenza S007A leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007A | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 44 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N FERA SUR4 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007A | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 52 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza S007A leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007A | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 52 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza S007A leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007A | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007A | Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 81 |
| Dry | 88 | 92 |
| Wet | 79 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 79 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 76 |
| Handling | 90 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S007A is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering response, and cornering stability, often providing a cost-effective alternative to premium competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While many users praise its value and performance, particularly in warm climates, it is frequently noted for a stiff ride quality—especially in run-flat configurations—and a significant drop-off in traction during cold weather or wet conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Sharp, responsive steering feedback
- High value-for-money, especially when found on closeout
- Strong performance in warm, summer conditions
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in cold temperatures (below 50°F/10°C)
- Stiff ride quality and increased road noise, particularly with run-flat variants
- Accelerated tread wear reported by many users
- Inconsistent wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
Observations
- Corvette owners frequently report that these tires offer a significant improvement in road noise and stability over stock Goodyear options, though they note a firmer ride.
- Users with high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles report difficulty putting power down in wet conditions, suggesting the tire is less suited for daily driving in unpredictable climates.
- Drivers of 19-inch low-profile setups report the most significant complaints regarding ride harshness and impact absorption.
The Nexen N Fera SUR4 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry grip and track-day environments, often providing value comparable to more expensive competitors. While enthusiasts praise its steering feedback and dry-weather handling, users should be aware that it is a dedicated summer compound that performs poorly in cold or wintry conditions and can be notably noisy for daily driving.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium track tires
- Predictable handling characteristics during spirited driving
- Strong performance as a dedicated track-day tire
Cons
- Significant road noise, making it less ideal for daily commuting
- Poor performance and lack of traction in snow or freezing temperatures
- Potential for hydroplaning in heavy rain or deep standing water
- Rapid tread wear when subjected to aggressive driving
Observations
- Performance enthusiasts on platforms like the Mitsubishi Evo X and BMW E39 M5 report excellent dry feedback but warn of instability in heavy rain.
- Users noted that the tire is prone to flat-spotting in cold weather until the rubber reaches operating temperature.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Bridgestone
81
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza S007A — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Nexen N FERA SUR4 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 81 vs 76 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 79 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 92 vs 88 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza S007A also compared with
Nexen N FERA SUR4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.