Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 3 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza S01 vs Michelin Energy Saver+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Potenza S01 leads, 75–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 65 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
78
Dry
Potenza S01 +870Why this score
Source Potenza S01 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 83 71 -
76
Wet
Potenza S01 +670Why this score
Source Potenza S01 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 78 69 -
70
Comfort
Energy Saver+ +171Why this score
Source Potenza S01 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 70 72 -
68
Treadwear
Energy Saver+ +573Why this score
Source Potenza S01 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 69 77 -
84
Handling
Potenza S01 +1272Why this score
Source Potenza S01 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 84 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S01 | Michelin Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 71 |
| Dry | 78 | 70 |
| Wet | 76 | 70 |
| Comfort | 70 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 73 |
| Handling | 84 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza S01
Energy Saver+
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza S01
Pros
- Exceptional grip levels in both wet and dry conditions
- Superior handling characteristics favored by performance-oriented vehicles
- High-speed stability and performance consistency
Cons
- Very rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- High levels of road noise
- Stiff and uncomfortable ride quality
Tire B Energy Saver+
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear and longevity with many users reporting high mileage (30,000 to 60,000+ miles)
- Impressive fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather traction and slippery behavior during cornering or braking in the rain
- Prone to aquaplaning at higher speeds on wet roads
- Tendency to develop sidewall cracking or dry rot as the tires age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S01 | B · Michelin Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza S01
Michelin Energy Saver+
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza S01 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver+ if treadwear matters most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza S01 scores 84 vs 72 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza S01 scores 78 vs 70 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza S01 scores 76 vs 70 on wet.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 73 vs 68 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.