Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT vs Firestone F590 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Firestone

Firestone F590

Summer Touring tires

Firestone F590 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
7 owner reviews
Dry
69
Wet
59
Comfort
83
Treadwear
71
Handling
56
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT and Firestone F590 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT is stronger on handling. Firestone F590 is stronger on comfort.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) F590 leads by 1
A
68
B
69
Why this score
SourceTuranza ER300 RFTF590
Tire Rack owners 86 –
Tyre Reviews owners 66 69

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A
59
B
59
Why this score
SourceTuranza ER300 RFTF590
Tire Rack owners 80 –
Tyre Reviews owners 57 59

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) F590 leads by 17
A
66
B
83
Why this score
SourceTuranza ER300 RFTF590
Tire Rack owners 74 –
Tyre Reviews owners 65 83

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) F590 leads by 1
A
70
B
71
Why this score
SourceTuranza ER300 RFTF590
Tire Rack owners 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners 70 71

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Turanza ER300 RFT leads by 11
A
67
B
56
Why this score
SourceTuranza ER300 RFTF590
Tyre Reviews owners 67 56

Scores at a glance

CategoryBridgestone Turanza ER300 RFTFirestone F590
Relative Score 66 67
Dry 68 69
Wet 59 59
Comfort 66 83
Treadwear 70 71
Handling 67 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT

The Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT receives a polarized reception, primarily serving as an OEM-fitted tire for BMW vehicles. While some users appreciate its longevity and acceptable dry-weather performance, many report significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction, ride harshness, and inconsistent tread life.

Pros

  • Commendable tread longevity for some users, with reports of 30,000 to 50,000 miles
  • Acceptable dry-road handling and stability for standard motorway driving
  • Reliable run-flat functionality as an OEM solution

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather grip and lack of confidence in rainy conditions
  • Harsh ride quality characteristic of early-generation run-flat technology
  • High road noise levels
  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature replacement as early as 12,000-13,000 miles

Observations

  • Users operating BMW 1-Series and 2-Series models frequently report dissatisfaction with grip levels compared to non-run-flat alternatives.
  • Drivers of larger BMW 5-Series models reported higher mileage returns, suggesting the tire may perform better on heavier, long-distance touring vehicles.
Tire B Firestone F590

The Firestone F590 receives a mixed reception, characterized by inconsistent performance in wet conditions and concerns regarding long-term durability. While some users appreciate its initial grip and hydroplaning resistance, others report significant safety issues regarding traction loss during acceleration and premature sidewall degradation.

Pros

  • Effective hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
  • Adequate dry grip for standard daily driving
  • Reliable performance for basic commuting needs

Cons

  • Poor traction during low-speed acceleration leading to wheel spin
  • Premature tread wear and sidewall perishing
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance causing safety concerns
  • High rolling resistance despite being marketed as a fuel-saver

Observations

  • Owners of smaller, low-horsepower vehicles like the Fiat Punto and Ford Fiesta reported frequent traction loss during standing starts.
  • Long-term users noted that while tread depth may remain, sidewall integrity can fail after several years of use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT B · Firestone F590
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Firestone

Too close to call: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT and Firestone F590 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT is stronger on handling. Firestone F590 is stronger on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone F590 scores 83 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT scores 67 vs 56 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone F590
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.