67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Firestone F590 vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Firestone F590 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | F590 | Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | F590 | Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | F590 | Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 85 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
F590 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | F590 | Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 58 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | F590 | Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Dynapro M/T leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | F590 | Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 56 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone F590 | Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 75 |
| Dry | 69 | 82 |
| Wet | 59 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 85 |
| Comfort | 83 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 83 |
| Handling | 56 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone F590 receives a mixed reception, characterized by inconsistent performance in wet conditions and concerns regarding long-term durability. While some users appreciate its initial grip and hydroplaning resistance, others report significant safety issues regarding traction loss during acceleration and premature sidewall degradation.
Pros
- Effective hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Adequate dry grip for standard daily driving
- Reliable performance for basic commuting needs
Cons
- Poor traction during low-speed acceleration leading to wheel spin
- Premature tread wear and sidewall perishing
- Inconsistent wet weather performance causing safety concerns
- High rolling resistance despite being marketed as a fuel-saver
Observations
- Owners of smaller, low-horsepower vehicles like the Fiat Punto and Ford Fiesta reported frequent traction loss during standing starts.
- Long-term users noted that while tread depth may remain, sidewall integrity can fail after several years of use.
The Hankook Dynapro M/T is widely regarded as a high-value, durable mud-terrain tire that excels in longevity and off-road traction. While many users praise its impressive tread life and surprising on-road manners, some report significant performance degradation in wet conditions as the rubber compound ages.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall durability
- Strong off-road traction in mud and gravel
- Surprisingly low noise levels for a mud-terrain tire
- High value-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip as the tire ages
- Potential for compound hardening over time
- Susceptibility to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
Observations
- Users operating heavy 4x4 vehicles report that the tires handle high-load conditions well, though some experience surface punctures when frequently driving on gravel.
- Owners of older, heavy SUVs (e.g., Ford Expedition) noted that aftermarket siping significantly improved performance in varied conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone F590 | B · Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Firestone
75
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Firestone F590 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone F590 scores 83 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 75 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 82 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 83 vs 71 on treadwear.
Tire A · Firestone F590
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro M/T
More comparisons
Also compared with
Firestone F590 also compared with
Hankook Dynapro M/T also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.