78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
45 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, treadwear and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO if wet and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Weather Control A005 EVO leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 87 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 65 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Weather Control A005 EVO leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 76 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 55 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Weather Control A005 EVO leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 77 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 75 |
| Dry | 88 | 85 |
| Wet | 83 | 88 |
| Snow | 81 | 67 |
| Comfort | 83 | 84 |
| Noise | 80 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 55 |
| Handling | 74 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO is widely regarded as a top-tier performer in wet conditions, offering exceptional grip and aquaplaning resistance that often exceeds competitor benchmarks. While users frequently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and initial performance, the consensus is heavily polarized by reports of rapid tread wear and a significant decline in performance as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong initial performance in cold and damp conditions
- Improved fuel efficiency compared to some summer-oriented tires
Cons
- Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
- Noticeable drop-off in performance as the tread wears down
- Reports of tread block cracking and structural deformation
- Increased noise levels as the tire ages
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles and EVs frequently reported faster-than-expected tread wear, often requiring replacement before 20,000 miles.
- Drivers transitioning from run-flat tires or stiff summer tires noted a significant improvement in ride quality and suspension compliance.
- Some users observed that moving to larger rim sizes (e.g., 17-inch) provided better handling stability compared to smaller 16-inch configurations.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 46 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, treadwear and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO if wet and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 81 vs 67 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 80 vs 73 on noise.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 88 vs 83 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.