Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental 4x4 Contact vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental 4x4 Contact

All Season Touring tires

Continental 4x4 Contact tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
35 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
75
Snow
65
Comfort
76
Noise
–
Treadwear
51
Handling
56

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Hankook

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

Summer Premium Touring tires

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
67 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
93
Snow
88
Comfort
94
Noise
91
Treadwear
91
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better treadwear, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 14
A — Continental 4x4 Contact
81
B — Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
95
Why this score
Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
Tire Rack owners 69 –
Tyre Reviews owners 81 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 18
A — Continental 4x4 Contact
75
B — Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
93
Why this score
Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
Tire Rack owners 63 –
Tyre Reviews owners 75 78

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 23
A — Continental 4x4 Contact
65
B — Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
88
Why this score
Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
Tire Rack owners 47 –
Tyre Reviews owners 65 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 18
A — Continental 4x4 Contact
76
B — Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
94
Why this score
Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
Tire Rack owners 66 –
Tyre Reviews owners 76 86

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental 4x4 Contact
–
B — Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
91

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 40
A — Continental 4x4 Contact
51
B — Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
91
Why this score
Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
Tire Rack owners 36 –
Tyre Reviews owners 51 86

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dynapro HP2 RA33 leads by 21
A — Continental 4x4 Contact
56
B — Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
77
Why this score
Source4x4 ContactDynapro HP2 RA33
Tyre Reviews owners 56 77

Scores at a glance

Continental 4x4 Contact vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental 4x4 ContactHankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Relative Score 66 90
Dry 81 95
Wet 75 93
Snow 65 88
Comfort 76 94
Noise – 91
Treadwear 51 91
Handling 56 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental 4x4 Contact

The Continental 4x4 Contact is a polarizing tire that receives mixed reviews, primarily due to a significant disparity in tread life expectations. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and competent on-road handling in wet and dry conditions, a substantial portion of owners report premature wear and poor performance in challenging winter or off-road environments.

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable grip in standard wet and dry road conditions
  • Competent performance for light-duty, on-road SUV use
  • Generally positive initial impressions as original equipment

Cons

  • Extremely inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Poor traction in deep snow, ice, and mud
  • High price point relative to longevity and performance
  • Negative impact on fuel economy for some users

Observations

  • Freelander 2 owners report highly inconsistent experiences, with some achieving high mileage while others report rapid degradation.
  • Users of heavier SUVs and luxury vehicles (e.g., Mercedes G-Class) report the most severe tread wear issues, often under 5,000 miles.
  • Drivers of smaller SUVs like the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue frequently cited disappointment with the tire's lifespan compared to expectations for the vehicle class.
Tire B Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

The Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented touring tire for SUVs and light trucks. Users consistently praise its quiet ride, smooth handling, and excellent price-to-performance ratio, often comparing it favorably to premium brands like Michelin. While most drivers report strong all-weather traction, a minority of users have expressed concerns regarding wet-weather cornering stability and variable tread life.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet road handling
  • Easy to balance during installation

Cons

  • Occasional reports of wet-weather cornering instability
  • Inconsistent tread life expectations
  • Noticeable road noise on specific surfaces like concrete
  • Slight vibration when cold

Observations

  • Owners of full-size SUVs and trucks (e.g., Ford F-150, Range Rover, Armada) frequently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Drivers of compact SUVs like the Ford Kuga report mixed experiences, with some praising the smooth ride while others note a lack of confidence in sharp, wet cornering.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental 4x4 Contact B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
CategoryAll Season Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available117
Rim diameters19″15″ – 22″
Tread depth10 - 11/32″—
UTQG360 - 420 A A—
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Hankook

Winner: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — better treadwear, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 91 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 88 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 77 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 scores 93 vs 75 on wet.

Tire A · Continental 4x4 Contact
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.