Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental 4x4 Contact vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | 4x4 Contact | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tire Rack owners | 69 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 93 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | 4x4 Contact | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 90 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | 4x4 Contact | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 47 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | 4x4 Contact | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 66 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 80 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | 4x4 Contact | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 72 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | 4x4 Contact | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 36 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 51 | 79 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | 4x4 Contact | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 56 | 88 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental 4x4 Contact | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 81 |
| Dry | 81 | 88 |
| Wet | 75 | 90 |
| Snow | 65 | 52 |
| Comfort | 76 | 82 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 51 | 79 |
| Handling | 56 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental 4x4 Contact is a polarizing tire that receives mixed reviews, primarily due to a significant disparity in tread life expectations. While many users appreciate its quiet ride and competent on-road handling in wet and dry conditions, a substantial portion of owners report premature wear and poor performance in challenging winter or off-road environments.
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable grip in standard wet and dry road conditions
- Competent performance for light-duty, on-road SUV use
- Generally positive initial impressions as original equipment
Cons
- Extremely inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- Poor traction in deep snow, ice, and mud
- High price point relative to longevity and performance
- Negative impact on fuel economy for some users
Observations
- Freelander 2 owners report highly inconsistent experiences, with some achieving high mileage while others report rapid degradation.
- Users of heavier SUVs and luxury vehicles (e.g., Mercedes G-Class) report the most severe tread wear issues, often under 5,000 miles.
- Drivers of smaller SUVs like the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue frequently cited disappointment with the tire's lifespan compared to expectations for the vehicle class.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
- High value-for-money proposition
- Strong braking performance
- Good rim protection features
Cons
- Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
- Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
- Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
- Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
- Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental 4x4 Contact | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 16 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 360 - 420 A A | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Goodyear
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental 4x4 Contact if snow matters most to you.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 88 vs 56 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 79 vs 51 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 75 on wet.
Continental 4x4 Contact scores 65 vs 52 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.