37
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Avon 3D Ultra vs Continental Conti eContact — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
58
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
54/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental Conti eContact — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Avon 3D Ultra if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Conti eContact leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Conti eContact |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 65 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Conti eContact leads by 50
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Conti eContact |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Conti eContact leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Conti eContact |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 70 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
3D Ultra leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Conti eContact |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 40 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Conti eContact leads by 60
Why this score
| Source | 3D Ultra | Conti eContact |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 5 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon 3D Ultra | Continental Conti eContact |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 37 | 58 |
| Dry | 55 | 65 |
| Wet | 10 | 60 |
| Comfort | 60 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 40 |
| Handling | 5 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
37
/ 100
Tire A
58
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon 3D Ultra receives highly polarized feedback, with users reporting vastly different experiences regarding grip and compound durability. While some riders praise the tire for its predictable handling and excellent performance during spirited riding, others report significant issues with the rubber hardening and losing traction almost immediately.
Pros
- Predictable and stable handling during spirited riding
- High levels of grip when operating within the intended temperature range
- Comfortable ride quality and smooth turn-in characteristics
Cons
- Reports of the rubber compound hardening and becoming 'shiny' prematurely
- Inconsistent grip performance leading to safety concerns
- Potential for rapid degradation in specific use cases
Observations
- Performance appears highly sensitive to riding style and surface conditions, leading to conflicting reports on thermal management.
The Continental Conti eContact receives a mixed to negative reception from users, primarily due to its performance limitations in adverse weather and concerns regarding durability. Many owners express a preference for replacing these tires with all-season alternatives or premium competitors shortly after vehicle acquisition.
Pros
- Acceptable performance for standard daily driving in fair conditions
- Commonly included as original equipment on new vehicles
Cons
- Poor confidence and traction in wet and snowy conditions
- Limited tread life and durability against road hazards
- High price point relative to the perceived value and longevity
- Lack of versatility compared to dedicated all-season tires
Observations
- Users frequently report replacing these tires prematurely due to dissatisfaction with their performance as original equipment.
- The tire is perceived as unsuitable for regions experiencing harsh winter conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon 3D Ultra | B · Continental Conti eContact |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Electric Vehicle tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
37
/ 100
Avon
58
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental Conti eContact — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Avon 3D Ultra if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental Conti eContact scores 65 vs 5 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental Conti eContact scores 60 vs 10 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Avon 3D Ultra scores 60 vs 40 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental Conti eContact scores 65 vs 55 on dry.
Tire A · Avon 3D Ultra
Tire B · Continental Conti eContact
More comparisons
Also compared with
Avon 3D Ultra also compared with
Continental Conti eContact also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.