58
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
54/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental Conti eContact vs Firestone RoadHawk — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
66/100
44 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone RoadHawk — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Continental Conti eContact if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Conti eContact | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Conti eContact | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Conti eContact leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Conti eContact | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 39 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 71 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Conti eContact | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
RoadHawk leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Conti eContact | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 55 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Conti eContact leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Conti eContact | RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 63 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Conti eContact | Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 66 |
| Dry | 65 | 84 |
| Wet | 60 | 75 |
| Comfort | 70 | 52 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 40 | 55 |
| Handling | 65 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental Conti eContact receives a mixed to negative reception from users, primarily due to its performance limitations in adverse weather and concerns regarding durability. Many owners express a preference for replacing these tires with all-season alternatives or premium competitors shortly after vehicle acquisition.
Pros
- Acceptable performance for standard daily driving in fair conditions
- Commonly included as original equipment on new vehicles
Cons
- Poor confidence and traction in wet and snowy conditions
- Limited tread life and durability against road hazards
- High price point relative to the perceived value and longevity
- Lack of versatility compared to dedicated all-season tires
Observations
- Users frequently report replacing these tires prematurely due to dissatisfaction with their performance as original equipment.
- The tire is perceived as unsuitable for regions experiencing harsh winter conditions.
The Firestone RoadHawk is a polarizing mid-range tire that excels in comfort and wet-weather grip for daily commuting but suffers from significant durability concerns. While many users praise its value and performance on smaller, lighter vehicles, a substantial portion of owners report rapid, uneven tread wear and soft sidewalls that compromise handling precision during spirited driving.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and noise suppression
- Competitive price point compared to premium brands
- Effective performance for standard, non-sporty daily driving
Cons
- Rapid and often uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'mushy' feel and visual appearance of under-inflation
- Lack of steering feedback and precision in cornering
- Reports of premature cracking or perishing in low-mileage scenarios
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Fiesta, Golf) report higher satisfaction regarding comfort and handling compared to owners of heavier diesel estates or vans.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles frequently report significant sidewall deflection and poor cornering confidence, often requiring higher tire pressures to compensate.
- The tire is frequently criticized for lack of stability when fitted to commercial vans, with users noting a 'wobbling' sensation under load.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Conti eContact | B · Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Electric Vehicle tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Continental
66
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone RoadHawk — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Continental Conti eContact if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone RoadHawk scores 84 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental Conti eContact scores 70 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone RoadHawk scores 75 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone RoadHawk scores 55 vs 40 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental Conti eContact
Tire B · Firestone RoadHawk
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental Conti eContact also compared with
Firestone RoadHawk also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.