82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 80 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 80 | 78 |
| Comfort | 86 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 75 |
| Handling | 80 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality. While it offers impressive dry and wet grip for daily driving and spirited maneuvers, it is generally categorized as a balanced all-rounder rather than a dedicated track-focused performance tire.
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
- Reliable dry and wet weather traction for daily use
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by a minority of users
Observations
- Users frequently report significant noise reduction when replacing factory-fitted tires on mid-sized sedans like the Honda Civic and Mazda 6.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines (e.g., Ford Falcon XR6) noted faster wear on rear tires compared to fronts.
- The tire is noted for improving ride quality on vehicles previously fitted with stiffer, performance-oriented rubber.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 88 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 78 vs 75 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.