79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
39 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Michelin Power SuperSport Evo — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
93/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Power SuperSport Evo — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC6 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC6 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC6 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 100 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC6 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Power SuperSport Evo leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC6 | Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Michelin Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 88 |
| Dry | 90 | 100 |
| Wet | 77 | 80 |
| Comfort | 79 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 80 |
| Handling | 87 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that offers an exceptional balance between sporty handling and daily comfort. Users frequently highlight its impressive dry and wet grip, often comparing it favorably to more expensive premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners praise its value and steering precision, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and sidewall durability.
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
- Surprisingly comfortable ride quality for a performance-oriented tire
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
- Wet performance may degrade significantly as the tire approaches the end of its life
Observations
- Users noted that the tire provides a more direct and accurate steering feel compared to softer touring-focused tires, particularly on 17-inch fitments.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those frequently driving on rough, coarse surfaces reported higher levels of road noise.
- The tire is frequently praised for its ability to improve the handling characteristics of daily drivers and older sedans.
The Michelin Power SuperSport Evo is highly regarded by riders for its exceptional dry grip, rapid warm-up times, and precise handling characteristics. Users consistently report increased confidence during aggressive cornering and canyon riding compared to competing sport-oriented tires.
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Rapid warm-up time for immediate performance
- High levels of rider feedback and steering precision
- Superior bump absorption compared to direct competitors
Cons
- Limited data available regarding long-term tread longevity
- Insufficient user feedback on wet weather performance
Observations
- Riders of sportbikes, such as the Suzuki GSXR, report significant performance improvements over previous-generation tires like the Pilot Power 2CT.
- The tire is specifically noted as an ideal upgrade for weekend canyon riding and spirited road use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Michelin Power SuperSport Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Continental
88
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Power SuperSport Evo — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 100 vs 79 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 100 vs 90 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 80 vs 71 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo scores 95 vs 87 on handling.
Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Michelin Power SuperSport Evo
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 also compared with
Michelin Power SuperSport Evo also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.