–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiProContact vs Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 72 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 51 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 56 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 53 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 66 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 62 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact | Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 66 |
| Dry | – | 79 |
| Wet | – | 72 |
| Snow | – | 56 |
| Comfort | – | 53 |
| Treadwear | – | 66 |
| Handling | – | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ presents a polarizing user experience, often praised for its dry and wet handling capabilities but frequently criticized for significant cabin noise and vibration issues. While some owners appreciate its durability and value compared to premium alternatives, others find the ride quality and acoustic comfort unacceptable for daily driving.
Pros
- Strong dry and wet pavement traction
- Solid cornering stability and steering response
- Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers
- Reliable performance in light snow conditions
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin drone
- Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
- Lack of confidence in severe winter or icy conditions
Observations
- Owners of heavier, high-torque vehicles like the Mercedes-Benz E-Class reported better-than-expected tread longevity.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., VW GTI) frequently cited dissatisfaction with noise levels compared to previous tire sets.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact | B · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 56 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Continental
66
/ 100
Continental
Only Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiProContact also compared with
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.