–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ContiProContact vs Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 69 |
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 84 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tire Rack owners | 51 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 45 |
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact | Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 80 |
| Dry | – | 76 |
| Wet | – | 80 |
| Snow | – | 80 |
| Comfort | – | 60 |
| Noise | – | 84 |
| Treadwear | – | 87 |
| Handling | – | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 is widely regarded as a high-value all-season tire that excels in cold, wet, and snowy conditions. While most users praise its longevity and consistent performance across varied climates, some report concerns regarding increased road noise and significant performance degradation in extreme summer heat.
Pros
- Excellent traction and stability in wet, snowy, and icy conditions
- Strong tread longevity and durability over high mileage
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Reliable dry handling and braking performance in moderate temperatures
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, particularly at higher speeds
- Poor braking performance and safety concerns in high-temperature summer conditions
- Potential for premature dry rotting or tread degradation in specific climates
Observations
- Users across various compact vehicle platforms, including the Dacia Logan and Suzuki Splash, report consistent satisfaction with the tire's multi-season versatility.
- The tire demonstrates reliable performance for high-mileage drivers, with several users reporting over 20,000 miles of use while maintaining adequate tread depth.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact | B · Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 56 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Continental
80
/ 100
Firestone
Only Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiProContact also compared with
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.