–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiProContact vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Nexen N FERA SUR4 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 44 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 51 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 52 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 52 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiProContact | N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 88 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact | Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 81 |
| Dry | – | 92 |
| Wet | – | 75 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | – | 80 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | – | 76 |
| Handling | – | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Nexen N Fera SUR4 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry grip and track-day environments, often providing value comparable to more expensive competitors. While enthusiasts praise its steering feedback and dry-weather handling, users should be aware that it is a dedicated summer compound that performs poorly in cold or wintry conditions and can be notably noisy for daily driving.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium track tires
- Predictable handling characteristics during spirited driving
- Strong performance as a dedicated track-day tire
Cons
- Significant road noise, making it less ideal for daily commuting
- Poor performance and lack of traction in snow or freezing temperatures
- Potential for hydroplaning in heavy rain or deep standing water
- Rapid tread wear when subjected to aggressive driving
Observations
- Performance enthusiasts on platforms like the Mitsubishi Evo X and BMW E39 M5 report excellent dry feedback but warn of instability in heavy rain.
- Users noted that the tire is prone to flat-spotting in cold weather until the rubber reaches operating temperature.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact | B · Nexen N FERA SUR4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 56 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Continental
81
/ 100
Nexen
Only Nexen N FERA SUR4 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiProContact also compared with
Nexen N FERA SUR4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.