80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Michelin Pilot Road 4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
94
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
1,952 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Road 4 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road 4 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road 4 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 84 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road 4 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 84 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road 4 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road 4 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Michelin Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 94 |
| Dry | 83 | 96 |
| Wet | 72 | 94 |
| Comfort | 83 | 94 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 91 |
| Handling | 79 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
94
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiRoad Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance sport-touring tire that excels in dry-weather handling and offers a unique 'cold-mould' construction that minimizes warm-up time. While the majority of users praise its agility and confidence-inspiring feedback, a minority of riders report inconsistent wet-weather performance and issues with front-end stability or cupping as the tire reaches the end of its service life.
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
- Predictable handling characteristics that inspire rider confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
- Limited off-road capability, prone to sliding on loose surfaces
Observations
- Users on heavier sport-touring machines like the ZZR noted that the tire's profile significantly quickens steering response compared to OEM alternatives.
- Riders on dual-sport or adventure-style bikes (e.g., KTM 1190, DRZ SM) noted that while excellent on pavement, the tire is not suitable for sandy or loose off-road conditions.
The Michelin Pilot Road 4 is widely regarded as a premier all-season tire, particularly praised for its exceptional wet-weather performance and confidence-inspiring handling. While most users appreciate the balance of comfort, longevity, and safety, some high-performance drivers note a lack of sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires, and a subset of users report concerns regarding tread life and road noise.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of comfort and reduced road noise compared to OEM run-flats
- Predictable and stable handling in varied road conditions
- Strong longevity for a performance-oriented tire
Cons
- Increased rolling resistance leading to reduced fuel/battery range in EVs
- Reported inconsistency in tread life across different vehicle types
- Less sharp steering response compared to dedicated summer performance tires
- Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on certain pavement types
Observations
- EV owners, particularly Tesla users, frequently report a noticeable decrease in range (approx. 10-20%) due to higher rolling resistance.
- Motorcycle riders note that the tire requires a significant 'bedding-in' period before reaching optimal grip levels.
- Users replacing factory run-flat tires consistently report a drastic improvement in ride quality and cabin comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Michelin Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Continental
94
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Road 4 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 94 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 96 vs 79 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 96 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 94 vs 83 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiRoad Attack
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Road 4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiRoad Attack also compared with
Michelin Pilot Road 4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.