80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiRoad Attack if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 98 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 93 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiRoad Attack leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 71 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 2 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 85 |
| Dry | 83 | 98 |
| Wet | 72 | 80 |
| Comfort | 83 | 93 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 71 |
| Handling | 79 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiRoad Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance sport-touring tire that excels in dry-weather handling and offers a unique 'cold-mould' construction that minimizes warm-up time. While the majority of users praise its agility and confidence-inspiring feedback, a minority of riders report inconsistent wet-weather performance and issues with front-end stability or cupping as the tire reaches the end of its service life.
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
- Predictable handling characteristics that inspire rider confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
- Limited off-road capability, prone to sliding on loose surfaces
Observations
- Users on heavier sport-touring machines like the ZZR noted that the tire's profile significantly quickens steering response compared to OEM alternatives.
- Riders on dual-sport or adventure-style bikes (e.g., KTM 1190, DRZ SM) noted that while excellent on pavement, the tire is not suitable for sandy or loose off-road conditions.
The Continental ContiSportAttack 2 is highly regarded by sportbike riders for its exceptional grip, rapid warm-up times, and predictable handling characteristics. While it excels in both spirited road riding and track day applications, users note that its performance-oriented compound leads to relatively rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive riding conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
- Strong performance in both track and street environments
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Observations
- Riders of middleweight and liter-class sportbikes (e.g., ZX6R, Speed Triple 1050) report high satisfaction with cornering confidence.
- Commuters note that the tire's longevity is significantly reduced by high-mileage daily use, making it less ideal for non-sporting utility.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Continental
85
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiRoad Attack if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 95 vs 79 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 98 vs 83 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 84 vs 71 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 93 vs 83 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiRoad Attack
Tire B · Continental ContiSportAttack 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiRoad Attack also compared with
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.