80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Michelin Pilot Road — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Road — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Continental ContiRoad Attack if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiRoad Attack leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Road leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Pilot Road |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Michelin Pilot Road |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 85 |
| Dry | 83 | 80 |
| Wet | 72 | 78 |
| Comfort | 83 | 90 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 95 |
| Handling | 79 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiRoad Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance sport-touring tire that excels in dry-weather handling and offers a unique 'cold-mould' construction that minimizes warm-up time. While the majority of users praise its agility and confidence-inspiring feedback, a minority of riders report inconsistent wet-weather performance and issues with front-end stability or cupping as the tire reaches the end of its service life.
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
- Predictable handling characteristics that inspire rider confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
- Limited off-road capability, prone to sliding on loose surfaces
Observations
- Users on heavier sport-touring machines like the ZZR noted that the tire's profile significantly quickens steering response compared to OEM alternatives.
- Riders on dual-sport or adventure-style bikes (e.g., KTM 1190, DRZ SM) noted that while excellent on pavement, the tire is not suitable for sandy or loose off-road conditions.
The Michelin Pilot Road is generally regarded as a durable and versatile sport-touring tire that excels in longevity and all-weather performance. While most users praise its predictable handling and impressive tread life, some riders find its limits insufficient for aggressive, high-performance sport riding.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity compared to dedicated sport tires
- Reliable wet weather grip and confidence-inspiring feedback
- Versatile performance across varied road conditions and surfaces
- Predictable behavior when approaching traction limits
Cons
- Lack of high-end dry grip for aggressive cornering
- Susceptibility to flat-spotting during extended motorway use
- Inconsistent performance for riders transitioning from dedicated sport compounds
Observations
- Users on middleweight sport bikes like the SV650S report excellent versatility for both commuting and spirited riding.
- Riders of older 600cc sport bikes may find the tire's performance envelope too conservative for spirited canyon or track-style riding.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Michelin Pilot Road |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Continental
85
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Road — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Continental ContiRoad Attack if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Road scores 95 vs 84 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Road scores 90 vs 83 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Road scores 78 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 83 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Continental ContiRoad Attack
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Road
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiRoad Attack also compared with
Michelin Pilot Road also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.