80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental ContiRoad Attack and Pirelli Angel GT are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiRoad Attack is stronger on treadwear and handling. Pirelli Angel GT is stronger on wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Angel GT leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 81 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 83 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiRoad Attack leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 79 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiRoad Attack leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 80 |
| Dry | 83 | 83 |
| Wet | 72 | 81 |
| Comfort | 83 | 83 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 79 |
| Handling | 79 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiRoad Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance sport-touring tire that excels in dry-weather handling and offers a unique 'cold-mould' construction that minimizes warm-up time. While the majority of users praise its agility and confidence-inspiring feedback, a minority of riders report inconsistent wet-weather performance and issues with front-end stability or cupping as the tire reaches the end of its service life.
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
- Predictable handling characteristics that inspire rider confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
- Limited off-road capability, prone to sliding on loose surfaces
Observations
- Users on heavier sport-touring machines like the ZZR noted that the tire's profile significantly quickens steering response compared to OEM alternatives.
- Riders on dual-sport or adventure-style bikes (e.g., KTM 1190, DRZ SM) noted that while excellent on pavement, the tire is not suitable for sandy or loose off-road conditions.
The Pirelli Angel GT is widely regarded as a high-performance sport-touring tire that excels in wet conditions and provides significant rider confidence. While many users praise its longevity and grip, performance can vary significantly depending on the motorcycle's weight and the specific 'A' specification requirements for heavier touring bikes.
Pros
- Excellent wet weather performance and grip
- High level of rider confidence and feedback
- Strong longevity for many sport-touring applications
- Stable handling for loaded, two-up touring
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear on specific motorcycle models
- Potential for handling degradation as the front tire wears
- Specific 'A' spec requirement is critical for heavy bikes to avoid premature shoulder wear
- Some users report a 'flat' or 'tame' handling profile compared to stock tires
Observations
- Heavy sport-touring motorcycles like the FJR1300 require the 'A' specification to prevent premature shoulder wear.
- Users on lighter sport bikes report excellent performance, though some note a loss of 'lively' handling compared to stock rubber.
- Front tire wear patterns on certain VFR models can lead to under-steering and reduced confidence as the tire reaches the end of its life.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Continental
80
/ 100
Pirelli
Too close to call: Continental ContiRoad Attack and Pirelli Angel GT are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiRoad Attack is stronger on treadwear and handling. Pirelli Angel GT is stronger on wet.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli Angel GT scores 81 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 84 vs 79 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 79 vs 76 on handling.
Tire A · Continental ContiRoad Attack
Tire B · Pirelli Angel GT
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiRoad Attack also compared with
Pirelli Angel GT also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.