80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Pirelli Angel ST — better wet and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiRoad Attack if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Angel ST leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 84 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Angel ST leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Angel ST leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 89 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiRoad Attack leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Angel ST leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ContiRoad Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 82 |
| Dry | 83 | 84 |
| Wet | 72 | 83 |
| Comfort | 83 | 89 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 78 |
| Handling | 79 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiRoad Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance sport-touring tire that excels in dry-weather handling and offers a unique 'cold-mould' construction that minimizes warm-up time. While the majority of users praise its agility and confidence-inspiring feedback, a minority of riders report inconsistent wet-weather performance and issues with front-end stability or cupping as the tire reaches the end of its service life.
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
- Predictable handling characteristics that inspire rider confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
- Limited off-road capability, prone to sliding on loose surfaces
Observations
- Users on heavier sport-touring machines like the ZZR noted that the tire's profile significantly quickens steering response compared to OEM alternatives.
- Riders on dual-sport or adventure-style bikes (e.g., KTM 1190, DRZ SM) noted that while excellent on pavement, the tire is not suitable for sandy or loose off-road conditions.
The Pirelli Angel ST is widely regarded as a dependable, versatile sport-touring tire that offers a strong balance of dry grip, stability, and longevity. While users generally praise its predictable handling and confidence-inspiring performance in varied conditions, some riders report inconsistent wear patterns and a noticeable drop-off in performance as the tire nears the end of its service life.
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and cornering stability
- Predictable and reliable performance in wet conditions
- Strong longevity for sport-touring applications
- Neutral and responsive steering characteristics
Cons
- Rapid, sudden wear once the tire reaches the end of its tread life
- Requires a brief warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to premium competitors
- Potential for cupping if tire pressures are not strictly managed
Observations
- Heavy sport-touring motorcycles, such as the Yamaha FJR1300, benefit from running higher-than-factory tire pressures to prevent cupping and improve responsiveness.
- The rear tire performance is noted to be more stable and predictable when the motorcycle is loaded with a passenger and luggage, suggesting the carcass design favors heavier loads.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Continental
82
/ 100
Pirelli
Winner: Pirelli Angel ST — better wet and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiRoad Attack if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli Angel ST scores 83 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 84 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Pirelli Angel ST scores 89 vs 83 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiRoad Attack
Tire B · Pirelli Angel ST
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiRoad Attack also compared with
Pirelli Angel ST also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.