82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental ContiSport Attack and Pirelli Angel ST are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSport Attack is stronger on dry and handling. Pirelli Angel ST is stronger on wet, treadwear and comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 84 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Angel ST leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Angel ST leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 89 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Angel ST leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 81 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 82 |
| Dry | 94 | 84 |
| Wet | 74 | 83 |
| Comfort | 86 | 89 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 78 |
| Handling | 91 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSport Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling, cornering stability, and predictable feedback. While users consistently praise its track-capable grip and agility, there is a clear divide regarding longevity, with some riders experiencing rapid tread wear depending on bike weight and riding style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
- Strong performance on track and spirited canyon riding
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Observations
- Lighter motorcycles like the Suzuki SV650 report significantly better mileage (up to 12,500km front) compared to high-output sportbikes like the ZX10R.
- Users noted that the tire's performance profile is better suited for canyon carving and track use than for high-mileage commuting.
The Pirelli Angel ST is widely regarded as a dependable, versatile sport-touring tire that offers a strong balance of dry grip, stability, and longevity. While users generally praise its predictable handling and confidence-inspiring performance in varied conditions, some riders report inconsistent wear patterns and a noticeable drop-off in performance as the tire nears the end of its service life.
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and cornering stability
- Predictable and reliable performance in wet conditions
- Strong longevity for sport-touring applications
- Neutral and responsive steering characteristics
Cons
- Rapid, sudden wear once the tire reaches the end of its tread life
- Requires a brief warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to premium competitors
- Potential for cupping if tire pressures are not strictly managed
Observations
- Heavy sport-touring motorcycles, such as the Yamaha FJR1300, benefit from running higher-than-factory tire pressures to prevent cupping and improve responsiveness.
- The rear tire performance is noted to be more stable and predictable when the motorcycle is loaded with a passenger and luggage, suggesting the carcass design favors heavier loads.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
82
/ 100
Pirelli
Too close to call: Continental ContiSport Attack and Pirelli Angel ST are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSport Attack is stronger on dry and handling. Pirelli Angel ST is stronger on wet, treadwear and comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 94 vs 84 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 91 vs 81 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Pirelli Angel ST scores 83 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Pirelli Angel ST scores 78 vs 74 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Pirelli Angel ST
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSport Attack also compared with
Pirelli Angel ST also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.