Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental CrossContact A/TR vs BFGoodrich A/T KO2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
CrossContact A/TR is ahead, 72–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
CrossContact A/TR +1361Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR A/T KO2 Reviews found online 77 56 -
72
Wet
CrossContact A/TR +1458Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR A/T KO2 Reviews found online 74 54 -
69
Comfort
CrossContact A/TR +960Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR A/T KO2 Reviews found online 70 51 -
69
Treadwear
CrossContact A/TR +663Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR A/T KO2 Reviews found online 70 62 -
75
Handling
CrossContact A/TR +2748Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR A/T KO2 Reviews found online 75 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact A/TR | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 59 |
| Dry | 74 | 61 |
| Wet | 72 | 58 |
| Comfort | 69 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 63 |
| Handling | 75 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
CrossContact A/TR
A/T KO2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact A/TR
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong traction in both wet and dry road conditions
- Impressive snow and ice performance for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Reports of a jarring or uncomfortable ride quality
- Inconsistent customer service regarding warranty claims
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Tire B A/T KO2
Pros
- Exceptional durability and long tread life, holding up well over years and extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road performance in mud, rocks, and sand with reliable sidewall strength when aired down
- Aggressive, appealing visual styling ('badass' look)
Cons
- Increased road noise during daily city driving
- Less than optimal comfort on-road
- Compromised performance and grip in wet on-road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact A/TR | B · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact A/TR
BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Winner: Continental CrossContact A/TR — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 75 vs 48 on handling.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 72 vs 58 on wet.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 74 vs 61 on dry.
Continental CrossContact A/TR scores 69 vs 60 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.