78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Continental CrossContact LX25 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
92/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, snow and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 71 |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 99 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 86 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 97 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 95 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Continental CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 90 |
| Dry | 88 | 82 |
| Wet | 83 | 92 |
| Snow | 81 | 94 |
| Comfort | 83 | 94 |
| Noise | 80 | 93 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 89 |
| Handling | 74 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Continental CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | — |
| Sizes available | 46 | 40 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 740 A A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
90
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, snow and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 81 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 93 vs 80 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 83 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX25
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Continental CrossContact LX25 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.