Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-50 RFT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Blizzak LM-50 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)70–
    Reviews found online85–
  2. 80

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Blizzak LM-50 RFT
    Reviews found online84–
  3. 52

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Blizzak LM-50 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)39–
    Reviews found online71–
  4. 75

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Blizzak LM-50 RFT
    Reviews found online80–
  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Blizzak LM-50 RFT
    Reviews found online78–
  6. 72

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Blizzak LM-50 RFT
    Reviews found online75–
  7. 81

    Handling

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Blizzak LM-50 RFT
    Reviews found online81–
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-50 RFT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Bridgestone Blizzak LM-50 RFT
Relative Score 73 –
Dry 76 –
Wet 80 –
Snow 52 –
Comfort 75 –
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 72 –
Handling 81 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CrossContact LX25

Blizzak LM-50 RFT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Blizzak LM-50 RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-50 RFT
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-50 RFT

Only Continental CrossContact LX25 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-50 RFT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.