Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 80 · 24 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken Azenis RT 615 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 77–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +1165Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Azenis RT 615 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 85 63 -
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +2258Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 84 54 -
52
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Azenis RT 615 Professional tests (TWG score) 39 – Reviews found online 71 – -
75
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +1560Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 80 52 -
71
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 78 – -
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +765Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 75 64 -
81
Handling
CrossContact LX25 +1665Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 81 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Falken Azenis RT 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 63 |
| Dry | 76 | 65 |
| Wet | 80 | 58 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 60 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 65 |
| Handling | 81 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
CrossContact LX25
Azenis RT 615
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B Azenis RT 615
Pros
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
- Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
- Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving
Cons
- Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
- Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Falken Azenis RT 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Falken Azenis RT 615
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 58 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 81 vs 65 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 75 vs 60 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 65 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.