Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200

All Season Touring tires

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
23 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
86
Snow
77
Comfort
83
Noise
Treadwear
80
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 4
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
78
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS200
Professional tests (TWG score) 71
Tire Rack owners 93
Tyre Reviews owners 93 78
SimpleTire owners 99

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 6
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
86
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tire Rack owners 92
Tyre Reviews owners 93 86
SimpleTire owners 93

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 17
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
77
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS200
Professional tests (TWG score) 100
Tire Rack owners 83
Tyre Reviews owners 90 77
SimpleTire owners 86

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 11
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
83
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tire Rack owners 90
Tyre Reviews owners 97 83
SimpleTire owners 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS200
SimpleTire owners 94

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 9
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
80
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tire Rack owners 91
Tyre Reviews owners 93 80
SimpleTire owners 89

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 5
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
80
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tyre Reviews owners 85 80
DriverReviews owners 80

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
Relative Score 90 81
Dry 82 78
Wet 92 86
Snow 94 77
Comfort 94 83
Noise 93
Treadwear 89 80
Handling 85 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 50% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 14% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test +35.7 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200

The Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile all-season tire that excels in wet conditions and provides reliable performance across a broad temperature spectrum. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and impressive longevity, a small minority of users report issues with tread deformation or instability in specific dry-weather handling scenarios.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong durability and slow tread wear over high mileage
  • Reliable performance in light to moderate snow and cold temperatures

Cons

  • Reports of potential tread deformation or 'egg-shaping' on rougher roads
  • Occasional instability or 'nervous' handling during aggressive dry-weather cornering
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision at the absolute limit
  • Some users noted a decline in performance as the tire ages

Observations

  • Users with SUVs and estate vehicles (e.g., Subaru Forester, VW Touran) frequently report high satisfaction with the tire's stability and confidence in adverse weather.
  • The non-directional tread pattern is specifically highlighted as a benefit for longevity, as it allows for easier tire rotation compared to directional competitors.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
CategoryAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40
Rim diameters16″ – 22″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″
UTQG740 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure44 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Falken

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better snow, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 77 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 83 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 80 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 86 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.