Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken FK452 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken FK452

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Falken FK452 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
211 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
72
Snow
–
Comfort
73
Noise
–
Treadwear
69
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Falken FK452
82
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25FK452
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 82
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 20
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Falken FK452
72
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25FK452
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 72
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken FK452
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25FK452
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 21
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken FK452
73
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25FK452
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 97 73
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Falken FK452
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25FK452
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 20
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Falken FK452
69
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25FK452
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 69
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 12
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Falken FK452
73
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25FK452
Tyre Reviews owners 85 73

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken FK452: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken FK452
Relative Score 89 73
Dry 82 82
Wet 92 72
Snow 94 –
Comfort 94 73
Noise 93 –
Treadwear 89 69
Handling 85 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Falken FK452

The Falken FK452 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive dry and wet grip, often rivaling premium brands at a significantly lower price point. While many users praise its predictable handling and value, a notable segment of owners reports issues with road noise, rapid tread wear, and soft sidewalls that can impact steering precision.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong dry and wet traction for spirited driving
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics
  • Attractive, aggressive tread pattern design

Cons

  • High levels of road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'bearing-like' sound
  • Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feel or 'gelatinous' handling
  • Lack of adequate rim protection

Observations

  • Users with high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles frequently reported faster rear tire wear and occasional traction loss under heavy acceleration.
  • Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., Audi A8, BMW 7 Series) noted that the soft sidewalls could lead to increased tramlining and less precise turn-in compared to stiffer premium alternatives.
  • Some users observed that the tire width can run slightly narrower than other brands of the same nominal size, occasionally causing fitment or aesthetic concerns.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken FK452
Category—Summer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Falken

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 73 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 69 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 85 vs 73 on handling.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Falken FK452

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.