89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
92/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken Linam VAN01 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
49
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 49
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 43 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 34
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 60 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 52
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 37 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 53 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Falken Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 49 |
| Dry | 82 | 63 |
| Wet | 92 | 43 |
| Snow | 94 | – |
| Comfort | 94 | 60 |
| Noise | 93 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | 37 |
| Handling | 85 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
49
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 13% #8/16 · 2019 ADAC Van 215/65 R16 C Tyre Test | +37.5 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Falken Linam VAN01 receives highly polarized feedback from users, with experiences ranging from reliable wet-weather performance to significant traction issues. While some drivers praise its durability and quiet operation compared to previous sets, others report premature tread wear and a concerning lack of grip in damp conditions.
Pros
- Strong wet-weather traction for some users
- Improved durability and tread life compared to budget alternatives
- Low noise levels during operation
- Stiff sidewall construction providing stability
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip leading to wheel spin
- Reports of premature tread wear in high-torque applications
- Lack of confidence in emergency braking performance
- Significant performance variance between different driving styles and road conditions
Observations
- Users driving front-wheel-drive vans report higher instances of wheel spin and traction loss during acceleration.
- Performance appears highly sensitive to the specific vehicle's torque delivery, with some users suggesting the tire is better suited for non-driven axles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Falken Linam VAN01 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Van |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Continental
49
/ 100
Falken
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 43 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 85 vs 53 on handling.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Falken Linam VAN01
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental CrossContact LX25 also compared with
Falken Linam VAN01 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.